Archive for the 'client-agency relationships' Category

03
Dec

Best posts of 2009

istock_000007990142xsmallThis month BrandSTOKE is one year old.

I’m honored that you take the time to read and comment. My goal for 2010 is to engage more conversation. If you have any suggestions for topics or improving the blog, please let me know.

Thanks for your interest and support. I’ll try to do better next year.

Here’s a list of some of the most popular posts as well as a few personal favorites from the last twelve months:

On brand building:

On brands vs. commodities:

On simplicity and effectiveness of messaging:

On smarter strategy:

On getting hired:

Just for fun:


15
Jul

Brand essence by every other name

istock_000001711671xsmallIn an effort to brand themselves, marketing consultants have done a disservice to their clients by creating a multitude of words and phrases that describe essentially the same thing — brand essence.

At least, that’s what I call it. You may call it something else.

Some firms have gone so far as to trademark their terms and the processes they use for determination. End result: confusion.

The forerunner of brand essence may have been the Unique Selling Proposition (also Unique Selling Point), a concept developed and named by Rosser Reeves of Ted Bates & Company.

In a post, “The USP: Still unique 50 years on?“, Digby Richards, CEO of Bates 141, argues that the USP is still relevant. He admits, however, that due to the advent of product parity, it has evolved into the Emotional Selling Proposition. ESP is a concept much closer to our common understanding of “brand essence,” as its focus is on the brand’s intangible differentiator.

Here is a collection of words and phrases used to describe what is unique about a brand as perceived by consumers:

  • Brand Soul
  • Brand Heart
  • Brand Mantra
  • Brand Promise
  • Signature Strength
  • Core Strength
  • Core Attribute
  • Brand Description
  • Brand Differentiator
  • Brand Personality
  • Brand Experience
  • Brand Connection
  • Brand Persona
  • Brand’s Life Force
  • The “-ness” of the brand
  • Brand Uniqueness
  • Brand Individuality
  • Brand Meaning
  • Brand’s Central Nature
  • Brand Proposition
  • Brand Essence
  • Brand DNA

What terms can you add to this list?

A note to purists: I admit that there may be shades of difference between some of these terms. You could make a case that brand personality and brand promise, for example, mean two completely different things. My point is that the differences are largely semantical and do little to advance the branding process.

08
Jun

Integration vs. specialization: who wants the hot seat?

istock_000007979164xsmallHow do you decide between working with a full-service, integrated marketing firm or an array of specialists? (See recent post on the meaning of the terms full-service, integrated, channel-neutral and hybrid.)

Consider the difference between a department store, such as Macy’s or Walmart, and a specialty store such as Best Buy or Lowe’s. You go to the department store for convenience, everything under one roof. You go to the specialty store for greater expertise and selection within the category.

CMOs must make a similar decision. Hire a generalist firm or an army of specialists in research, strategy, creative, media-buying, web development, PR, direct marketing, SEM/SEO, video production, design, social media, and more?

Which approach is better?

The answer lies in whether you wish to be the conductor or not.

Imagine the discord if every musician in an orchestra played his or her own selection simultaneously without coordination. It’s the definition of cacophony.

Or picture a house built without a general contractor to supervise the subs. Not only would the schedule and budget suffer, but the home would likely be unlivable.

To achieve results in marketing, someone has to coordinate the effort. Will it be you supervising a collection of specialists or will it be a full-service marketing firm coordinating within? To help decide, ask yourself who will keep your marketing:

On brand. A full-service firm with integrated services is typically responsible for defining and maintaining brand standards throughout multiple initiatives. It will be better at keeping your messages consistent.

Specialists will be accountable only for their own areas of responsibility and will not be effective at tending the larger brand. Does the PR messaging match the ad campaign? Does the web site reflect the standards? That will be your job.

On strategy. A generalist firm will serve as your strategic partner, unless you employ a separate strategy consultant. An team of specialists will rely upon you to set the course and give them direction.

On budget. A generalist firm will be responsible for allocating and staying within the overall budget as provided by you. Assuming they are channel-neutral, they will provide strategic recommendations within your budget (See recent post on sharing the budget upfront for smarter strategy.) Specialists will be responsible only for their individual allocation. It will be up to you manage the overall budget.

In sync. Specialists will meet their assigned deadlines only. Did the creative shop get the ads to the media-buying service on time? Has the web developer followed through on the SEM specialist’s recommendations? When working with multiple firms, you will be responsible for keeping all of the trains running on schedule. A generalist firm, on the other hand, will manage the timing and coordination of all of the campaign elements.

Off of the firing line. The CMO is ultimately accountable for results. Specialists will be responsible for their areas of concern only. Generalist firms expect to be involved in goal-setting upfront and are willing to take shared responsibility for overall results if included in strategy development.

Both approaches work. Would you rather hold one firm accountable or shoulder the responsibility of coordinating the efforts of many yourself? Which approach works best for you?

01
Jun

Is channel-neutral the new integrated?

istock_000008334928xsmallMarketing firms used to refer to themselves as “full-service.”

Then they were “integrated.”

Now they are “hybrid” and “channel-neutral.” And once again “integrated.”

What’s the difference?

Full-service means all of the services one might expect a marketing firm to offer are in-house. The firm does not specialize in any one function, such as media-buying or PR.

Integrated marketing, according to the American Marketing Association, is “a planning process designed to assure that all brand contacts received by a customer or prospect for a product, service, or organization are relevant to that person and consistent over time.” Today, the concept includes both online and offline marketing channels, which is why it has re-emerged.

A firm which describes itself as channel-neutral, H2M, says “we hold no bias nor any vested interest in any media, communication channel or holding company of any particular media channel. We house expertise in all media disciplines, but remain impartial as to each channel’s use. This guarantees truly unbiased recommendations regarding our clients’ business.”

Hybrid applies to the combination of expertise for both offline and online channels under one roof, i.e. a hybrid of a traditional marketing firm and an interactive firm. Offline channels include print, direct mail, public relations, outdoor, radio, and television. Online channels include search engine marketing and optimization, email, online advertising, social media marketing, and mobile marketing.

Notes for CMOs:

  • There is no standard for how many services make up full-service, nor does being full-service imply that the services are coordinated with each other.
  • Integration speaks to efficiency, not channel-neutrality.
  • These days you should expect all of a firm’s services to be integrated for better results. Integration should be the consultant’s responsibility, not yours.
  • You should also expect channel-neutrality from a strategic partner. It’s in your best interest to consider all options in an unbiased manner. Obviously, if you work with specialty firms, they are going to recommend their specialty.
  • More and more firms are claiming to be hybrids as they add services, but they are usually stronger in one area than another.
  • There are advantages to working with specialists and advantages to working with integrated marketing firms. The choice, as always, is yours.

P.S. Since posting, I’ve heard the phrase “channel-agnostic,” which presumably means the same as “channel-neutral.”

11
Mar

Why rfps often result in the worst hires

istock_000003292097xsmallI know several marketing professionals who love to pursue new business. They enjoy the prospecting, the networking, the strategizing, the problem-solving, the pitching. Yet I know absolutely no one who likes responding to RFPs (requests for proposal). I don’t even know any clients who like RFPs (and they originate them!).

Why are RFPs still around? It’s because they are perceived as:

  • fair (Everyone has a shot, including the unqualified.)
  • nonpolitical (Absolutely not true)
  • economical (The finalists are often asked to discount their fees to win the business.)
  • empowering (C’mon, it’s entertaining to watch these overpriced consultants jump through hoops, isn’t it?)
  • defensible (There is, after all, lots of process, paperwork and meetings to back up the hiring decision. This is why publicly funded organizations issue them.)

Everything about the RFP process is wrong and guarantees getting the worst candidate for the job hired.

Think about it. The firm that successfully navigates the process and “wins” the account:

  • had lots of free time on its hands
  • filled out all of the forms correctly
  • was more than willing to tap dance
  • shared ideas for free
  • worked all of the political angles
  • buckled to the compensation demands

The firm that did not respond:

  • was too busy being productive to participate in a cattle call
  • would rather talk strategy than fill out forms
  • prefers not to play politics
  • believes it offers fair market value without negotiating
  • would not staff with juniors after the award
  • gains business primarily through referrals

Here’s how to get a smarter hire minus the RFP:

  • Start by knowing what you are asking for. Know your objectives, your budget, your criteria, and who is making the hiring decision. Be willing to share all of this with candidates upfront.
  • Don’t limit your selection by geography or size. Limit instead by capabilities and experience.
  • Start a short list. Ask businesses whose marketing you admire to refer their firms.
  • Don’t waste the time of firms of who don’t meet your criteria, even if they beg.
  • Set up casual get-acquainted no-pressure meetings. Get to know the candidates. Learn how they think.
  • Visit their shops. Review their case studies. Get a feel for their culture.
  • Select a couple of them and give them small projects to find out what they’re like to work with. Kick their tires. Maybe you’ll find a good match without conducting a formal review.
  • If you decide to conduct a review, only invite 2-4 firms. Not 37.
  • Keep your review quiet or you will invite calls from non-candidates wanting in.
  • Don’t ask for speculative creative. Think about it: how could a firm that barely knows you make an intelligent recommendation?
  • Instead of asking for spec, ask how they might approach a problem strategically. Give them a reasonable amount of time to respond. Provide background research if they ask for it.
  • Accept that good work will come through partnership. Hire the best collaborator–not necessarily the best idea.

What other hiring tips do you recommend?

17
Feb

When to hire vs. when to outsource

istock_000007707944xsmallWhether the economy is in high gear or at a standstill, the debate on whether to hire or outsource is eternal. How do you decide when to add marketing staff and when to farm the work out? It seems to hinge upon four key factors:

1. Who has the expertise? Up to a point, many people believe they can do an adequate job of marketing their own organizations. (The number of business owners appearing in their own TV advertising is proof!) From designing your own business cards to hiring full-time web developers, do it internally and you “own” it.

Eventually, however, you may have to admit that you and your staff, no matter how large, do not have every necessary area of expertise covered. How important is it that all of the talent reside within the organization? The answer depends upon how integral the expertise in question is to your success. Some knowledge you want to own, and some you may be comfortable buying from outside.

Another consideration is whether the desired expertise is available for employment or outside consulting only. Even the largest marketing departments outsource some areas of expertise.

2. Who has the time? You and your staff may have the know-how, but do you have the time? If not, do you hire it or outsource it? Your decision will be dictated by your comfort level with giving up close day-to-day supervision as well as  your company’s current financial condition and position on hiring.

3. Who wants the accountability? Do you want it or would you rather hold someone else responsible? Hiring a marketing firm, for example, shifts some of the accountability for performance to them. Some marketing managers are uncomfortable with this arrangement; some prefer it and even embrace it.

4. Which approach is more cost-effective? Some believe hiring is less expensive than outsourcing to high-priced consultants. Some prefer to avoid paying expensive employee benefits and like the flexibility of paying for services on an as-needed basis. If money is the key factor, you will need to run a comparative cost analysis to decide between these two approaches.

Whether to hire or outsource may also depend upon which stage of the life cycle your company is in.

• Start-ups typically have both accountability and time on hand. If funded, they may be able to hire outside help. If not, they will market themselves, usually with limited staff.

• Small mom-and-pops have lots of hard-knocks expertise. They are also typically reluctant to give up accountability to an outside firm. With limited dollars and little time, they will choose between hiring a marketing manager or buying some outside expertise, usually on a freelance basis.

• Mid-size firms have a little time, a little talent, and a little money. They are particularly eager for expertise they don’t have and demand accountability. They are more likely to hire in-house expertise first, then look to an integrated marketing firm for support.

• Large firms have more expertise and money, and embrace more in-house accountability for managing the marketing process. To fill in the gaps among their marketing staff, they buy time and expertise from freelancers, integrated firms, and specialty firms. Keeping multiple consultants on strategy is an additional demand.

What factors do you consider when deciding whether to add staff vs. outsource?




Subscribe to the RSS feed

Archives


“9 Criteria for Brand Essence” Deck

The 9 Criteria for Brand Essence



twitter grader

Add to Technorati Favorites
Featured in Alltop

Invesp landing page optimization
Chris Brogan says I'm a Rockstar!

Top 100 Blogs Award
Brand Management featured writer