08
Feb
10

And the winner is … Google


In its Super Bowl commercial, Google tells an engaging little story of romance with simplicity and elegance. Appropriately, it uses keywords and search results only.

Its logo is onscreen almost the entire time, while it demonstrates several of its features and benefits. It effectively offsets Bing’s recent efforts at malignment.

Not only was the spot inexpensive to produce, but it stood out from the sophomoric humor and over-the top production of the majority of the commercials.

Erik Sherman, in his negative review of the spot at BNET, misses the point that by airing the spot in the Super Bowl, Google reached millions and millions who haven’t already seen it on YouTube.

Smart marketing all the way around.

Which spot do you feel was most effective?


1 Response to “And the winner is … Google”


  1. 1 Marc Paulenich Feb 9th, 2010 at 12:03 pm

    I can’t agree more, Kirk. They told a captivating brand narrative that not only showcased product features, but also remained true to a core brand value (simplicity). Coupled with an uninvasive way to display their logo throughout and the low-cost, Google wins in multiple ways.

Comments are currently closed.

Subscribe to the RSS feed

Archives


“9 Criteria for Brand Essence” Deck

The 9 Criteria for Brand Essence



twitter grader

Add to Technorati Favorites
Featured in Alltop

Invesp landing page optimization
Chris Brogan says I'm a Rockstar!

Top 100 Blogs Award
Brand Management featured writer