Archive for February, 2009

17
Feb

When to hire vs. when to outsource

istock_000007707944xsmallWhether the economy is in high gear or at a standstill, the debate on whether to hire or outsource is eternal. How do you decide when to add marketing staff and when to farm the work out? It seems to hinge upon four key factors:

1. Who has the expertise? Up to a point, many people believe they can do an adequate job of marketing their own organizations. (The number of business owners appearing in their own TV advertising is proof!) From designing your own business cards to hiring full-time web developers, do it internally and you “own” it.

Eventually, however, you may have to admit that you and your staff, no matter how large, do not have every necessary area of expertise covered. How important is it that all of the talent reside within the organization? The answer depends upon how integral the expertise in question is to your success. Some knowledge you want to own, and some you may be comfortable buying from outside.

Another consideration is whether the desired expertise is available for employment or outside consulting only. Even the largest marketing departments outsource some areas of expertise.

2. Who has the time? You and your staff may have the know-how, but do you have the time? If not, do you hire it or outsource it? Your decision will be dictated by your comfort level with giving up close day-to-day supervision as well as  your company’s current financial condition and position on hiring.

3. Who wants the accountability? Do you want it or would you rather hold someone else responsible? Hiring a marketing firm, for example, shifts some of the accountability for performance to them. Some marketing managers are uncomfortable with this arrangement; some prefer it and even embrace it.

4. Which approach is more cost-effective? Some believe hiring is less expensive than outsourcing to high-priced consultants. Some prefer to avoid paying expensive employee benefits and like the flexibility of paying for services on an as-needed basis. If money is the key factor, you will need to run a comparative cost analysis to decide between these two approaches.

Whether to hire or outsource may also depend upon which stage of the life cycle your company is in.

• Start-ups typically have both accountability and time on hand. If funded, they may be able to hire outside help. If not, they will market themselves, usually with limited staff.

• Small mom-and-pops have lots of hard-knocks expertise. They are also typically reluctant to give up accountability to an outside firm. With limited dollars and little time, they will choose between hiring a marketing manager or buying some outside expertise, usually on a freelance basis.

• Mid-size firms have a little time, a little talent, and a little money. They are particularly eager for expertise they don’t have and demand accountability. They are more likely to hire in-house expertise first, then look to an integrated marketing firm for support.

• Large firms have more expertise and money, and embrace more in-house accountability for managing the marketing process. To fill in the gaps among their marketing staff, they buy time and expertise from freelancers, integrated firms, and specialty firms. Keeping multiple consultants on strategy is an additional demand.

What factors do you consider when deciding whether to add staff vs. outsource?

09
Feb

9 criteria for brand essence

istock_000006752189xsmall

Your brand’s essence — just one word that sums up how your brand connects emotionally with your customers. Identifying it sounds simple enough, right?

After all, you know your business. You know your audience. But articulating how they feel about your brand in an authentic and meaningful way is often challenging. Few get it right.

The reason: essence is an intangible.

The features of a brand, e.g. lightweight, fast or blue, are tangibles. Easy to sense, describe, measure and compare.

The essence, on the other hand, is felt.

Lacing up a new pair of Nike running shoes feels inspirational. Riding a Harley-Davidson motorcycle feels liberating. Experiencing Walt Disney World with your children feels magical. Strong brands have well-defined, easily grasped, simply obvious essences.

It should be easy to figure out, but getting there takes soul searching. To get it right, one must know how your consumers experience your brand.

To help those who participate in determining a brand’s essence, here are the primary criteria. Test your essence against them.

1. single-minded One word is ideal. Maybe two. More than two words indicates that the brand has no focus. As a brand (by design) delivers a unique experience, having no focus makes for a weak brand.

2. intangible One is no more independent on a Harley-Davidson motorcycle than another brand, but somehow one feels like it. Tap into what the consumer feels.

3. unique The essence of a brand is how it is different from competitors in the same category. E.g., if Apple (and its products) are friendly and approachable, then it is claiming that its competitors are not.

4. experiential The essence captures what the consumer feels during an experience with the brand. E.g., “Driving a Volvo makes me feel that my family is safe.”

5. consistently delivered If the proposed essence is not consistently experienced (e.g, if a trip to Walt Disney World isn’t magical), then it isn’t the essence. Can your organization deliver?

6. authentic The essence must be credible or the brand will be rejected. To find out what consumers believe about your brand, ask them. It’s okay for the brand essence to be aspirational, but only if your customers believe you can deliver on the promise.

7. sustainable A brand’s essence is baked in. It doesn’t change. Ever.

8. meaningful There is no point in identifying an essence that is irrelevant to consumers. Essences that don’t connect are the reason behind many failed brands. Again, research.

9. scalable Will the essence work for brand extensions? Will it work as the brand’s opportunity grows?

How does your brand essence measure up to these criteria? What other criteria do you use?

Note: As organizations rarely publish their brand strategies, the examples above have been deduced by me based upon available marketplace evidence.

06
Feb

Are we done with celebrity endorsers yet?

istock_000007040798xsmallFor every Tiger Woods, there seems to be more than one Michael Phelps.

Why do brands keep trusting celebrities to represent them?

Is it time to retire the strategy of “borrowing equity” through endorsement deals? Historically, some celebs (like Woods, Bill Cosby and Michael Jordan) can be counted on to manage their image well, but obviously some are time bombs. Who knows when they will go off?

The dumping of Michael Phelps for “behavior … not consistent with the image of Kellogg” causes me to wonder again why any brand is willing to take the risk. Why place hard-earned brand equity in the hands of someone who doesn’t value it?

Celebrities are, after all, human beings, and therefore likely to err.

They may go ballistic like Christian Bale.

They might launch into a politically incorrect tirade, like Mel Gibson, Michael Richards and Don Imus.

They may be caught up in substance abuse scandals, like Barry Bonds and Floyd Landis.

Or convicted of animal cruelty like Michael Vick. Sorry, Nike.

Remember when OJ Simpson represented Hertz Car Rental? And Robert Blake represented STP Oil Treatment.

Some celebs rebound, some don’t. Martha Stewart is back. Kobe Bryant is mostly back. Alex Baldwin seems to have survived public outrage over the verbal abuse of his daughter. He recently starred in a Super Bowl spot for Hulu.

But with paparazzi and citizen journalists everywhere, celebrities are going to continue to be captured being human, whether cheating on their partners or their taxes. Why risk it?

04
Feb

How to rebuild confidence

Handing Over the Car Keys“Confidence may be one of the most valuable commodities of all in 2009,” says Jennifer Robison, Senior Editor for the Gallup Management Journal.

Valuable because it is scarce. The Consumer Confidence Index hit an all-time low in December. Given the hard realities of supply-and-demand economics, isn’t it odd that recovery hinges upon such a warm and fluffy intangible?
What is confidence and how do we grow it?
Confidence is essentially trust. And trust is knowing someone or something can hurt you and giving them the power to do it anyway.
Your 16-year-old son could die (god forbid) in an auto accident and break your heart forever. But you trust him with the car keys. You have confidence in his skills and good sense. You give him the power to hurt you. (You do not, however, trust the other drivers on the road. You don’t give them the power: they already have it.)

We trust our friends to pay back loans. We trust our partners not to cheat on us. We trust our employers and our clients to pay us for our work. When we stop trusting, it is because we’ve lost confidence. We believe we are going to get hurt. We are afraid to risk.

Dennis Jacobe, Ph.D., Gallup’s chief economist, says, “You can give money to consumers, but you can’t make them spend it. You can give money to businesses, but you can’t make them invest it. You can give money to banks, but you can’t make them loan it or force consumers and businesses to borrow it.”

President Carter, in his “Crisis of Confidence” speech in 1979, said, “(Confidence) is the idea which founded our nation and has guided our development as a people. We’ve always believed in something called progress. We’ve always had a faith that the days of our children would be better than our own.”

So how do we rebuild confidence?

It is both simple and difficult. By taking small risks everyday and encouraging others to do the same. By taking small chances that people and institutions will do what they say they will do. And when we don’t get hurt, we will eventually be willing to take larger risks.

Here’s a few ideas:

• Risk enhancing your service. Ask your customers what you can do to serve them better. Raise your standards. Review your service policies and procedures, and put better ones in place.

• Risk adding value. Discounting often increases cash flow in the short term, but can hurt loyalty in the long term. Instead, add value for the same price. Many online retailers did this by offering free shipping during the holidays.

• Risk treating your colleagues and suppliers as you wish to be treated. Be clear in your agreements. Be reasonable with your expectations. Pay them promptly.

What small risks will you take today? Share your ideas.




Subscribe to the RSS feed

"9 Criteria for Brand Essence" Deck

The 9 Criteria for Brand Essence


Archives


twitter grader

Add to Technorati Favorites
Featured in Alltop

Invesp landing page optimization
Chris Brogan says I'm a Rockstar!

Top 100 Blogs Award
Brand Management featured writer