29
Jan
09

How brand packages look different than commodities

img_1427img_1450

Recently a colleague and I studied the packages of 13 brands of ice cream in store environments. We compared the packages individually as well as en masse in the freezer cases.

Here’s what we found: The higher priced brands featured:

  • Consistent design throughout all lines: premium, light, no sugar added, fat-free, slow-churned, yogurt, co-branded, seasonal, etc.
  • Consistent signature brand elements: icons, colors, flavor ribbons, etc. Examples: Breyers’ green leaf, Edy’s brown-and-white striped rim
  • Large logos
  • Small or no photos of ice cream
  • Subtle design differentiation between lines
  • Subtle flavor callouts
  • Subtle category callout: “ice cream”

img_14331img_1463

The lower priced commodities featured:

  • Inconsistent design throughout all lines
  • No signature brand elements
  • Small logos
  • Large photos of ice cream
  • Bold design differentiation between lines
  • Bold flavor callouts
  • Bold category callout: “ice cream”

Our conclusions: Higher-priced brands promote the brand prominently on the packaging for quick recognition. The line, flavor and category are almost an afterthought. Presumably, their customers are brand-loyal and look for the distinctive packaging first before selecting a flavor. The commodity ice creams scream flavor prominently, apparently attempting to attract customers away from the other lower-priced options.

When buying ice cream, which do you shop for first? Brand, flavor, price, or line (e.g., fat-free or slow-churned)?



Subscribe to the RSS feed

Archives


“9 Criteria for Brand Essence” Deck

The 9 Criteria for Brand Essence



twitter grader

Add to Technorati Favorites
Featured in Alltop

Invesp landing page optimization
Chris Brogan says I'm a Rockstar!

Top 100 Blogs Award
Brand Management featured writer